Learning to GUIDE the Group: Self-Learning LLM Facilitation Across Multi-Party Tasks

Ziyi Liu (USC, work done at Google DeepMind), Nithum Thain, Crystal Qian and colleagues (Google DeepMind, Google Research, CMU, Penn State) present GUIDE, a framework in which an LLM learns one general group-facilitation playbook from conversations run by task-specific expert facilitators.
Ask this paper
Data. 432 multi-party human conversations guided by three task-specific expert LLM facilitators.
Self-learning. An LLM induces a natural-language playbook of facilitation rules from these conversations and refines it using an LLM judge aligned with human annotators. The final playbook has 53 rules, starting from an empty one.
Offline result. On held-out conversations the generalized playbook beats all three expert facilitators with a 61.4% win rate over 736 decision points.
Live study. In a real-time study it keeps facilitator performance and group productivity, improves speaking comfort and reduces friction, using 24.7% fewer turns and 29.0% fewer words than the expert prompts.
Abstract
As large language models are increasingly adopted as multi-party communication facilitators, there is a growing demand for agents capable of balancing diverse group dynamics across contexts. However, existing LLM facilitators are often fine-tuned for task-specific objectives; generalized LLM-based facilitation methods that can adapt to different types of tasks and diverse group dynamics are underdeveloped. To address this gap, we present GUIDE (Generalized Unified Intervention for Dynamic Exchanges, a framework for developing generalized LLM-based facilitators across different multi-party contexts. GUIDE evaluates facilitation across both objective task outcomes and subjective metrics, including psychological safety and perceived friction. Within this framework, we study whether LLMs can self-learn generalized facilitation strategy offline to real-time interventions. We first collect multi-party human interactions guided by task-specific expert LLM facilitators (N=432 conversations). We then employ a self-learning method in which an LLM induces an actionable strategic playbook from conversations and iteratively refines it using feedback from an LLM judge aligned with human annotators (N=20), developing a single generalized facilitator that outperforms the three task-specific expert facilitators on held-out conversations 61.4% win rate. Finally, we evaluate these improvements empirically; in a real-time online empirical study, the self-learned generalized facilitator preserves facilitator performance and group productivity, improves speaking comfort and reduces interpersonal friction, while using 24.7% fewer turns and 29.0% fewer words than the expert prompts. These findings provide empirical evidence that LLMs can learn generalizable, task-agnostic social facilitation from task-specific human interactions, on-par with hand-crafted task-specific prompts across diverse group settings.