ReFigBench: Benchmarking Scientific Figure Reconstruction as Editable PowerPoint Artifacts

Liyang Fan, Chi Wei, Bo Li and colleagues at SIAT (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Shenzhen University and China Tower introduce ReFigBench, 1,000 real arXiv overview figures that coding agents must rebuild as editable PowerPoint slides, and use it to separate model effects from harness effects.
Ask this paper
Task design. Each source image must become a native, editable PPTX slide that keeps text, topology, layout and document structure, which tests perception, planning and tool use together.
Ten configurations. Agents from the GPT, Claude, MiMo and MiniMax families run under direct code generation and a specialized PPTX workflow, and GPT-5.5 runs inside both Claude Code and Codex with the model held fixed.
Harness changes the outcome. The same model gains from the specialized workflow in one harness and loses in the other, and the harness shifts scores even under an identical direct prompt.
Fidelity versus editability. The specialized workflow removes native connectors in every configuration, yet human judges still prefer its renderings in most matchups.
Evaluation stack. Deterministic artifact checks, three GPT-5.4 judging runs, three Qwen3.6-27B rescoring runs and blinded human comparisons; perception stays the main bottleneck and iterative rendering recovers only part of it.
Abstract
Multimodal coding agents are expected to turn visual inputs into usable artifacts, and they act through a harness, the layer of tools, context management, and execution environment around the model. Existing evaluations often isolate short tool calls, API traces, or screenshot resemblance, and a low score under these proxies cannot say whether the model saw poorly, planned poorly, or was failed by its harness. We study scientific overview figure reconstruction, an agent task in which a source image must become an editable PowerPoint slide that preserves text, topology, layout, and native document structure. We introduce ReFigBench, a benchmark and evaluation framework built on 1,000 real overview figures retrieved from arXiv papers with full provenance. Coding agents from four model families reconstruct every figure under two workflows, direct code generation and a specialized PPTX workflow, and the strongest model runs inside two commercial harnesses, yielding ten configurations. Evaluation combines deterministic artifact checks, repeated automated scoring by judges from two model families, and blinded human comparisons. Perception remains a bottleneck that iterative rendering only partly repays. Whether workflow effort converts into quality depends on the model together with its harness, since the same model gains from the specialized workflow inside one harness and loses inside the other, and the harness shifts scores even under an identical direct prompt. The specialized workflow erases native connectors in every configuration, human judges still prefer its renderings in most matchups, and even the strongest agent falls short of the rubric ceiling. These results expose the tension between fidelity and editability as the central challenge for practical multimodal document agents.