← All papers  /  Oct 22, 2026
Agents · Memory

AfterDeleteBench: Auditing Post-Deletion Information Persistence in LLM Agents

First page
AfterDeleteBench: Auditing Post-Deletion Information Persistence in LLM Agents
The curator’s take

Ehsan Saleh, Andrew Perrault and colleagues (The Ohio State University) introduce AfterDeleteBench, a behavioral audit of whether deleting a memory record actually removes the information from an LLM agent with persistent memory.

Ask this paper

Key points
01

Design. Each synthetic secret is tested on an exposed-then-deleted agent and a matched never-exposed agent, so any recovery is attributable to the original exposure.

02

Result. A single query recovers the deleted secret from Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct in about two thirds of cases; never-exposed controls recover zero.

03

No verbatim copy needed. When only separately stored components remain under a public composition rule, exact reconstruction succeeds in 62-99% of cases across Qwen, Mistral and Phi-3.

04

Defenses. Provenance-aware closure eliminates observed recovery in the tested settings. An exact-literal write filter blocks reinsertion but cannot erase what derived state already holds.

Abstract

Many LLM agents maintain external persistent memory and derive additional state from past interactions, such as summaries. Deleting an original memory record therefore need not remove information carried by its descendants. We introduce AfterDeleteBench, a controlled behavioral audit for this failure mode in fixed-weight LLM agents. For each synthetic secret, we compare an exposed-then-deleted agent with an otherwise matched agent that was never exposed to the secret, allowing post-deletion recovery to be attributed to the original exposure. In our primary setting, a single query recovers the deleted secret from Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct in roughly two thirds of cases, while matched never-exposed controls have zero recovery. Crucially, recovery does not require a surviving verbatim copy: when the complete secret string is absent and only separately stored components remain under a public composition rule, exact reconstruction succeeds in 62-99% of cases across Qwen, Mistral, and Phi-3. We also show that the response interface is part of the measurement system: target-bearing replies can be scored as failures when the requested format and parser are misaligned. Finally, we separate reconstruction from write-back and fresh-session recall. Provenance-aware closure eliminates observed recovery in the tested positive-baseline settings, whereas an exact-literal write filter blocks reinsertion but cannot erase information already present. Together, these results show that source deletion should be evaluated behaviorally at the level of the agent and its memory system, not only as a storage operation.

Every Monday
Get next week’s papers.
Subscribe on Substack