🚀NEW LABGetting Started with Claude AgentsStart lab
Reasoning

Evidence of Meaning in Language Models Trained on Programs

First page
Evidence of Meaning in Language Models Trained on Programs
Paper summary

Argues LMs learn meaning despite only next-token prediction.

Ask this paper

Key points
01

Programs as controlled input: Uses programs (which have well-defined semantics) to study whether LMs learn meaning versus surface patterns.

02

Intermediate-state prediction: Shows that LMs trained on programs learn to predict program state after each statement - evidence of semantic understanding.

03

Probe experiments: Careful probing experiments distinguish surface correlations from semantic representations.

04

Emergence argument: Adds empirical grounding to the "LLMs have world models" debate that dominated 2023's interpretability discussions.

Every Monday
Get next week’s papers.
Subscribe on Substack