🚀NEW COURSEVibe Coding AI Apps with Claude Code 🤖✨Enroll now
Reasoning

Evidence of Meaning in Language Models Trained on Programs

Free while signed in. Answers cite the passages they came from.

First page
Evidence of Meaning in Language Models Trained on Programs
The curator’s take

Argues LMs learn meaning despite only next-token prediction.

Key points
01

Programs as controlled input: Uses programs (which have well-defined semantics) to study whether LMs learn meaning versus surface patterns.

02

Intermediate-state prediction: Shows that LMs trained on programs learn to predict program state after each statement - evidence of semantic understanding.

03

Probe experiments: Careful probing experiments distinguish surface correlations from semantic representations.

04

Emergence argument: Adds empirical grounding to the "LLMs have world models" debate that dominated 2023's interpretability discussions.

Every Monday
Get next week’s papers.

The same picks and the same summaries, in your inbox. Free, and 176 issues deep.

Subscribe on Substack