Benchmarking Agents on Hard CLI Tasks
Free while signed in. Answers cite the passages they came from.

Terminal-Bench 2.0 presents a carefully curated hard benchmark composed of 89 tasks in computer terminal environments inspired by problems from real workflows. Each task features a unique environment, human-written solution, and comprehensive tests for verification, addressing the gap where current benchmarks either don't measure real-world tasks or aren't sufficiently difficult. - **Challenging for frontier models:** Frontier models and agents score less than 65% on the benchmark, demonstrating that Terminal-Bench meaningfully measures capabilities that current systems struggle with, unlike saturated benchmarks. - **Real-world task inspiration:** Tasks are derived from actual command-line workflows, ensuring the benchmark measures practical skills rather than artificial puzzles, with each task featuring unique environments reflecting diverse real scenarios. - **Comprehensive verification:** Every task includes human-written solutions and comprehensive tests for verification, enabling reliable and reproducible evaluation of agent performance on terminal-based tasks. - **Error analysis insights:** The authors conduct detailed error analysis to identify specific areas for model and agent improvement, providing actionable guidance for researchers developing more capable CLI agents. - **Open evaluation infrastructure:** The dataset and evaluation harness are publicly available at tbench.ai, enabling developers and researchers to benchmark their systems and contribute to advancing agent capabilities in terminal environments.
Challenging for frontier models: Frontier models and agents score less than 65% on the benchmark, demonstrating that Terminal-Bench meaningfully measures capabilities that current systems struggle with, unlike saturated benchmarks.
Real-world task inspiration: Tasks are derived from actual command-line workflows, ensuring the benchmark measures practical skills rather than artificial puzzles, with each task featuring unique environments reflecting diverse real scenarios.
Comprehensive verification: Every task includes human-written solutions and comprehensive tests for verification, enabling reliable and reproducible evaluation of agent performance on terminal-based tasks.
Error analysis insights: The authors conduct detailed error analysis to identify specific areas for model and agent improvement, providing actionable guidance for researchers developing more capable CLI agents.
Open evaluation infrastructure: The dataset and evaluation harness are publicly available at tbench.ai, enabling developers and researchers to benchmark their systems and contribute to advancing agent capabilities in terminal environments.
Abstract
AI agents may soon become capable of autonomously completing valuable, long-horizon tasks in diverse domains. Current benchmarks either do not measure real-world tasks, or are not sufficiently difficult to meaningfully measure frontier models. To this end, we present Terminal-Bench 2.0: a carefully curated hard benchmark composed of 89 tasks in computer terminal environments inspired by problems from real workflows. Each task features a unique environment, human-written solution, and comprehensive tests for verification. We show that frontier models and agents score less than 65\% on the benchmark and conduct an error analysis to identify areas for model and agent improvement. We publish the dataset and evaluation harness to assist developers and researchers in future work at this https URL .
Get next week’s papers.
The same picks and the same summaries, in your inbox. Free, and 176 issues deep.
Subscribe on Substack