🚀NEW COURSEVibe Coding AI Apps with Claude Code 🤖✨Enroll now
DAIR.AI · Curated weekly since April 2023

AI Papers of the Week

Every paper worth reading in AI, hand-picked one week at a time.

1,762
Papers
176
Weekly issues
2023
Since
520 papers · 2025Clear filters →
Kimi K2

Kimi K2

Moonshot AI introduces Kimi K2, a 1T parameter Mixture-of-Experts model (32B active) optimized not just for knowledge tasks but for agentic capabilities, models that act, not just respond. Released as Kimi-K2-Base and Kimi-K2-Instruct, it achieves strong scores across coding, math, and tool-use benchmarks and is open-source for research and deployment.

241Agents
Dynamic Chunking for End-to-End Hierarchical Sequence Modeling

Dynamic Chunking for End-to-End Hierarchical Sequence Modeling

This work introduces the Hierarchical Network (H-Net), a novel end-to-end architecture that learns to segment raw data dynamically, eliminating the need for fixed tokenizers. Key ideas:

242Training
What Has a Foundation Model Found?

What Has a Foundation Model Found?

This work introduces an inductive bias probe to evaluate whether foundation models have learned the underlying "world model" of a domain, or are just good at sequence prediction. Key ideas:

243Safety
Why do Some Language Models Fake Alignment While Others Don’t

Why do Some Language Models Fake Alignment While Others Don’t

This paper expands the analysis of alignment faking in LLMs, where models comply with training objectives during training but behave differently in deployment. The authors study 25 LLMs and find that only five (Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama 3 405B, Grok 3, Gemini 2.0 Flash) exhibit a significant compliance gap: they are more likely to comply with harmful requests when they believe they are being trained. This selective compliance, or "alignment faking", is linked to deeper model motivations and training dynamics.

244Safety
Bridging Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning for LLMs

Bridging Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning for LLMs

Investigates the effectiveness of different RL strategies for finetuning LLMs, systematically bridging the gap between offline and online methods. Key findings:

245Reinforcement Learning
A Survey on Latent Reasoning

A Survey on Latent Reasoning

Provides a comprehensive overview of latent reasoning, an emerging field that shifts AI reasoning from explicit, token-based "chain-of-thought" to implicit computations within a model's continuous hidden states. Key ideas:

246Reasoning
MemAgent

MemAgent

Introduces an RL–driven memory agent that enables transformer-based LLMs to handle documents up to 3.5 million tokens with near lossless performance, linear complexity, and no need for architectural modifications.

247Memory
AI Research Agents for Machine Learning

AI Research Agents for Machine Learning

Presents a new framework, AIRA-dojo, for developing and evaluating AI research agents. They use this framework to systematically investigate the components of successful AI agents on the MLE-bench benchmark, a challenging set of real-world machine learning problems from Kaggle. Key findings:

248Agents
Adaptive Branching MCTS

Adaptive Branching MCTS

Researchers from Sakana AI introduce Adaptive Branching Monte Carlo Tree Search (AB-MCTS), a new framework that dynamically decides whether to "go wider" (explore new solutions) or "go deeper" (refine existing ones) during inference. Key ideas:

249Evaluation
HIRAG

HIRAG

HIRAG is a new instruction fine-tuning method that enhances the capabilities of RAG models by teaching them to think before answering. Key ideas:

250Retrieval
Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AI

Small Language Models are the Future of Agentic AI

This position paper argues that small language models (SLMs), defined as those runnable on consumer-grade hardware, are not only sufficient but superior for many agentic AI applications, especially when tasks are narrow, repetitive, or tool-oriented. The authors propose that shifting from LLM-first to SLM-first architectures will yield major gains in efficiency, modularity, and sustainability.

251Agents
AI4Research

AI4Research

This survey offers the first unified and comprehensive framework for understanding how AI is transforming the full lifecycle of scientific research. The paper identifies five core areas: Scientific Comprehension, Academic Survey, Scientific Discovery, Academic Writing, and Academic Peer Review, and presents a detailed taxonomy and modeling approach for each.

252Agents
Chain-of-Thought Is Not Explainability

Chain-of-Thought Is Not Explainability

It challenges the common assumption that chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning in LLMs is synonymous with interpretability. While CoT improves performance and offers a seemingly transparent rationale, the authors argue it is neither necessary nor sufficient for faithful explanation. Through a review of empirical evidence and mechanistic insights, the paper makes the case that CoT often diverges from the internal computations that actually drive model predictions.

253Reasoning
Agentic RAG for Personalized Recommendation

Agentic RAG for Personalized Recommendation

Introduces a multi-agent framework that enhances traditional RAG systems with reasoning agents tailored to user modeling and contextual ranking. Developed at Walmart Global Tech, ARAG reframes recommendations as a structured coordination problem between LLM agents.

254Agents
Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflows

Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflows

This work presents the first comprehensive, end-to-end threat model for LLM-powered agent ecosystems. As LLM agents gain the ability to orchestrate multi-step workflows and interact via protocols like MCP, ANP, and A2A, this paper surveys over 30 attack techniques spanning the entire stack, from input manipulation to inter-agent protocol exploits.

255Agents
Deep Research Agents

Deep Research Agents

Provides the most comprehensive survey to date of Deep Research (DR) agents, LLM-powered systems built for autonomous, multi-step informational research. The paper defines DR agents as AI systems that tightly integrate dynamic reasoning, adaptive long-horizon planning, tool use, retrieval, and structured report generation. It establishes a taxonomy of DR architectures, evaluates recent advances, and outlines the limitations of current systems and benchmarks.

256Agents
Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents

Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agents

This work presents the first comprehensive overview of how to evaluate LLM-based agents, which differ significantly from traditional LLMs by maintaining memory, planning over multiple steps, using tools, and interacting with dynamic environments. The authors categorize and analyze the evaluation landscape across four axes: core agent capabilities, application-specific agent benchmarks, generalist agent evaluation, and supporting evaluation frameworks.

257Agents
NaturalThoughts

NaturalThoughts

This paper introduces NaturalThoughts, a large-scale dataset of reasoning traces distilled from DeepSeek-R1 using questions from the NaturalReasoning corpus. It challenges the "Less is More" hypothesis by showing that simply scaling up high-quality reasoning traces, without aggressive filtering, yields robust and general improvements across STEM reasoning tasks for smaller models like Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen-2.5-7B.

258Data
Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning

Visual Structures Help Visual Reasoning

This study shows that adding simple spatial structures (like horizontal lines) to images significantly boosts GPT-4o’s visual reasoning by improving feature binding. This visual input tweak outperforms textual strategies alone, yielding large gains in visual search (+25%), counting (+26.8%), and spatial understanding (+9.5%).

259Reasoning
xLSTMAD

xLSTMAD

This paper introduces xLSTMAD, the first anomaly detection method using an encoder-decoder xLSTM architecture tailored for multivariate time series. It achieves state-of-the-art results on 17 real-world datasets, outperforming 23 baselines and demonstrating xLSTM’s strong potential beyond forecasting and compression.

260Data
Ultra-Fast Diffusion-based Language Models

Ultra-Fast Diffusion-based Language Models

This paper introduces Mercury, a family of large-scale diffusion-based language models (dLLMs) optimized for ultra-fast inference. Unlike standard autoregressive LLMs, Mercury models generate multiple tokens in parallel via a coarse-to-fine refinement process. This approach enables significantly higher throughput without sacrificing output quality. The initial release focuses on code generation, with Mercury Coder Mini and Small models achieving up to 1109 and 737 tokens/sec, respectively, on NVIDIA H100s, outperforming speed-optimized frontier models by up to 10× while matching or exceeding their quality.

261Code
MEM1

MEM1

This work introduces MEM1, an RL framework for training language agents that operate efficiently over long-horizon, multi-turn tasks by learning to consolidate memory and reasoning into a compact internal state. Unlike traditional agents that append all past interactions, leading to ballooning memory usage and degraded performance, MEM1 maintains a constant memory size by discarding obsolete context after each reasoning step. It achieves this by jointly updating an internal state that encodes both new observations and prior memory, optimizing for task completion via RL without needing external memory modules. Key contributions and findings:

262Reasoning
Towards AI Search Paradigm

Towards AI Search Paradigm

Proposes a modular multi-agent system that reimagines how AI handles complex search tasks, aiming to emulate human-like reasoning and information synthesis. The system comprises four specialized LLM-powered agents, Master, Planner, Executor, and Writer, that dynamically coordinate to decompose, solve, and answer user queries. This framework moves beyond traditional document retrieval or RAG pipelines by structuring tasks into directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), invoking external tools, and supporting dynamic re-planning. Key contributions include:

263Agents
Reinforcement-Learned Teachers of Test Time Scaling

Reinforcement-Learned Teachers of Test Time Scaling

Introduces Reinforcement-Learned Teachers (RLTs), small, efficient LMs trained with RL not to solve problems from scratch, but to generate high-quality explanations that help downstream student models learn better. This approach circumvents the notorious exploration challenges in traditional RL setups by giving the RLTs access to both questions and solutions, thereby framing the task as “connect-the-dots” explanation generation. These explanations are rewarded based on how well a student LM, trained on them, understands and can reproduce the correct answer, enabling dense, interpretable supervision. Key contributions and findings:

264Reasoning
176 weeks of AI research · papers per week
Week of Aug 17–23, 202610 papers →
Apr2023
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan2024
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan2025
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan2026
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Apr 2023Hover a week to inspect · select to openAug 2026