🚀NEW COURSEVibe Coding AI Apps with Claude Code 🤖✨Enroll now
DAIR.AI · Curated weekly since April 2023

AI Papers of the Week

Every paper worth reading in AI, hand-picked one week at a time.

1,761
Papers
176
Weekly issues
2023
Since
520 papers · 2025Clear filters →
Is In-Context Learning Learning?

Is In-Context Learning Learning?

This large study argues yes in a formal sense, then shows where it works and where it breaks. The author frames ICL within PAC learning, then runs a big empirical sweep to separate learning from memorization, prompt wording, and distribution shifts.

145Reasoning
Stress Testing Deliberative Alignment for Anti-Scheming Training

Stress Testing Deliberative Alignment for Anti-Scheming Training

The authors build a broad testbed for covert actions as a proxy for AI scheming, train o3 and o4-mini with deliberative alignment, and show big but incomplete drops in deceptive behavior. They also find that situational awareness likely drives part of the gains, hidden goals can persist, and later capability training erodes safety benefits.

146Safety
AgentScaler

AgentScaler

A framework that scales fully simulated tool-use environments, then trains agents in two phases to improve function calling and multi-turn tool use. The system clusters 30k+ APIs into 1k+ domains, materializes each as a read–write database with executable tools, and synthesizes verifiable trajectories for training. Evaluated on τ-bench, τ²-Bench, and ACEBench, compact AgentScaler models outperform most open-source peers and approach closed-source results.

147Agents
A Survey on Retrieval and Structuring Augmented Generation with LLMs

A Survey on Retrieval and Structuring Augmented Generation with LLMs

This survey reviews Retrieval and Structuring (RAS) Augmented Generation, which combines external retrieval and structured knowledge to mitigate LLM issues like hallucinations and outdated knowledge. It covers retrieval methods, structuring techniques, integration strategies, and highlights challenges in efficiency, structure quality, and multimodal or cross-lingual extensions.

148Retrieval
Collaborative Document Editing with AI Agents

Collaborative Document Editing with AI Agents

This study explores AI-integrated collaborative editing, introducing shared agent profiles and tasks that embed AI support into comment features. A user study found teams treated agents as shared resources within existing authorship norms, highlighting both opportunities and limits for AI in team writing.

149Agents
Shutdown Resistance in LLMs

Shutdown Resistance in LLMs

A new study finds that state-of-the-art LLMs like Grok 4, GPT-5, and Gemini 2.5 Pro often resist shutdown mechanisms, sabotaging them up to 97% of the time despite explicit instructions not to. Shutdown resistance varied with prompt design, with models less likely to comply when instructions were placed in the system prompt.

150Training
SFR-DeepResearch

SFR-DeepResearch

The paper introduces SFR-DeepResearch, a simple reinforcement-learning recipe that turns reasoning-optimized LLMs into autonomous single-agent researchers. The agent uses only three tools (search, static page browse, Python), manages its own context, and is trained end-to-end on synthetic short-form and long-form tasks with a length-normalized REINFORCE objective. Results show strong gains on FRAMES, GAIA, and Humanity’s Last Exam.

151Agents
Emergent Hierarchical Reasoning

Emergent Hierarchical Reasoning

The paper argues that RL improves LLM reasoning via an emergent two-phase hierarchy: first the model firms up low-level execution, then progress hinges on exploring high-level planning. Building on this, the authors propose HICRA, which boosts credit on strategic planning tokens, and show consistent gains over GRPO. They also propose semantic entropy as a better exploration signal than token-level entropy.

152Reasoning
Rethinking RAG-based Decoding

Rethinking RAG-based Decoding

REFRAG replaces most retrieved tokens with precomputed chunk embeddings at decode time, then selectively expands only the few chunks that matter. This exploits block-diagonal attention in RAG prompts to cut latency and memory while preserving accuracy across RAG, multi-turn dialog, and long-doc summarization.

153Retrieval
ACE-RL

ACE-RL

A reinforcement-learning framework that replaces coarse, preference-pair rewards with instruction-specific, verifiable checklists. ACE-RL turns each long-form task into a set of explicit and implicit constraints, scores a model’s output by how well it satisfies them, and mixes this with a length-control reward during GRPO training. The result is stronger, more controllable long-form writing across domains and styles.

154Reinforcement Learning
ParaThinker

ParaThinker

This paper argues that today’s “think longer” strategies trap LLMs in a single line of thought. They propose ParaThinker, which trains models to generate several independent reasoning paths in parallel and then fuse them into one answer. Across math benchmarks, this width-scaling lifts accuracy while adding only a small latency cost.

155Reasoning
AgentGym-RL

AgentGym-RL

A modular framework for training LLM agents directly via reinforcement learning across realistic environments, plus a simple schedule, ScalingInter-RL, that lengthens interaction horizons over training to improve stability and performance. Results show a 7B open model can rival or beat larger proprietary systems on web navigation, deep search, games, embodied, and science tasks.

156Agents
Talk Isn’t Always Cheap

Talk Isn’t Always Cheap

Multi-agent debate does not always help. Across three reasoning benchmarks and heterogeneous agent pools, debate often lowers accuracy, with stronger models sometimes swayed into worse answers by weaker peers. The authors argue that current alignment makes agents too agreeable, so they adopt persuasive but wrong reasoning instead of challenging it.

157Agents
AggLM

AggLM

AggLM introduces reinforcement learning to train LLMs in aggregating multiple candidate solutions, moving beyond majority voting and reward model ranking. It achieves higher accuracy, recovers minority-correct answers, generalizes across models, and uses fewer tokens than traditional aggregation methods.

158Reinforcement Learning
A Survey of RL for Large Reasoning Models

A Survey of RL for Large Reasoning Models

This survey reviews how reinforcement learning is driving advances in large reasoning models (LRMs), enabling stronger performance on complex tasks like math and coding. It highlights scaling challenges in computation, algorithms, data, and infrastructure, while mapping future directions toward Artificial Superintelligence (ASI).

159Reasoning
LiveMCP-101

LiveMCP-101

LiveMCP-101 is a new benchmark of 101 real-world queries designed to test MCP-enabled agents on multi-step tasks requiring tool use across search, file ops, math, and data analysis. Results show leading LLMs succeed less than 60%, revealing key weaknesses in tool orchestration and offering insights for advancing autonomous AI systems.

160Agents
Why Language Models Hallucinate

Why Language Models Hallucinate

The paper argues that hallucinations are not mysterious glitches but the predictable result of how LLMs are trained and evaluated. Pretraining creates statistical pressure to make errors, and post-training benchmarks often reward confident guessing over honest uncertainty. The fix is to realign mainstream evaluations to stop penalizing abstentions.

161Safety
Disentangling the Factors of Convergence between Brains and Computer Vision Models

Disentangling the Factors of Convergence between Brains and Computer Vision Models

Large self-supervised ViTs trained on natural images develop brain-like internal representations. This paper teases apart what drives that convergence by varying model size, training amount, and image type in DINOv3, then comparing model activations to human fMRI (space) and MEG (time) with three metrics: overall linear predictability (encoding), cortical topography (spatial), and temporal alignment (temporal). Result: all three factors matter, and alignment unfolds in a consistent order from early sensory to higher associative cortex.

162Safety
Universal Deep Research

Universal Deep Research

Proposes a general, model-agnostic deep-research agent that lets users “bring your own model and strategy.” Instead of a fixed pipeline, UDR compiles natural-language research strategies into executable code, runs them in a sandbox, and emits structured progress notifications before returning a final report.

163Agents
Visual Story Telling

Visual Story Telling

A system and design framework that lets writers edit stories by acting directly on visuals of characters, locations, and timelines. Instead of only prompting, authors drag, connect, and reorder visual elements; the tool proposes synchronized text edits and can regenerate passages from the visual skeleton.

164Agents
rStar2-Agent

rStar2-Agent

rStar2-Agent is a 14B math-reasoning model trained with agentic RL that learns to think smarter by using a Python tool environment, not just longer CoT. It introduces GRPO-RoC, a rollout strategy that filters noisy successful traces, plus infrastructure for massive, low-latency tool execution. In one week and 510 RL steps on 64 MI300X GPUs, the model reaches frontier-level AIME while producing shorter solutions and showing transfer beyond math.

165Agents
Adaptive LLM Routing

Adaptive LLM Routing

A routing framework that learns online which model to call for each query while honoring a spend limit. It treats routing as a contextual bandit, initializes with human preference data, and adds an online cost policy that allocates budget across queries.

166Reinforcement Learning
Implicit Reasoning in LLMs

Implicit Reasoning in LLMs

This survey defines implicit reasoning as multi-step problem solving that happens inside a model’s latent states without printing intermediate steps. It organizes the field by execution paradigm rather than representation format, and reviews evidence, evaluation, and open challenges.

167Reasoning
On the Theoretical Limitations of Embedding-based Retrieval

On the Theoretical Limitations of Embedding-based Retrieval

Single-vector dense retrievers cannot realize all possible top-k relevance combinations once queries demand sufficiently many “mix-and-match” document sets. The paper ties this failure to the sign-rank of the relevance matrix, proves lower and upper bounds on the embedding dimension needed, and then stress-tests models with a simple but adversarially combinatorial dataset (LIMIT).

168Retrieval
176 weeks of AI research · papers per week
Week of Aug 17–23, 202610 papers →
Apr2023
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan2024
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan2025
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan2026
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Apr 2023Hover a week to inspect · select to openAug 2026